OS Euthenasia
 
It's a thought we all try to avoid, but when you get to be a certain age, you can't help but become obsessed with thoughts of The End. At some point, those you have known, loved, and worked with bite the dust. While it is possible to lengthen the lives of those slated to die by technological means, most of us take The End as a granted. All that's left are the memories and eulogies, when our favorite program goes off to the big database in the sky. But life goes on. After a computer program's life cycle has ended (I bet you thought I was talking about people!), we buck up and move forward, installing the next latest greatest tool being marketed as the solution to our computing needs.
 
When they use terms like "software life cycle," manufacturers obviously want to imply that the life of a program or operating system is similar to the life of a human being. There is a period of beta development (youth, in human terms), the "official release" (a Bar Mitzvah?), a period of productivity and support (the career years), and finally, the end of the life cycle, when the product is "outdated."
 
Humans do tend to run down with time, science tells us (although TV and radio constantly announces that "you're as young as you feel."). But that rule applies to organic beings only; computer programs don't get old! The code that went into Microsoft Office 97 when you cracked open the CD is exactly the same code used by the program on January 16, 2004, the day the program officially "died," according to the Microsoft Office Product Life Cycle Page (http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeofficefam). Does this mean that Office 97, more than 10 years after it was released, self-destructed or was suddenly invaded by swarms of byte-eating maggots? Absolutely not; there are still millions of computers throughout the world using Office 97, and their owners have found absolutely no reason to "upgrade" - i.e. buy - a replacement for a tool they are perfectly happy with. What gets "old" is our satisfaction with the program, or perhaps what we're experiencing is a "confidence crisis," where we begin to believe the program is not up to possible future tasks, even if it continues to do what it did before perfectly well.
 
But isn't staying "up to date" in the software world important? Aren't you missing out on all the nifty new features, as well as setting yourself up for potential "compatibility" problems? Well, it depends; new features are nice, if you're going to use them. But most people still using Office 97 are perfectly happy with the way it works; they don't NEED the extra features in Office 2000 or 2003. Why try to fix it if it ain't broke? Upgrading for many people means spending money, spending time learning how to use the new interface the program is likely to have, and probably spending money buying new memory or other hardware to get the upgrade to run properly!
 
Now, if you go to the computer store and all they have available are Pentium V's, obviously the software and operating system have to be powerful enough to handle the hardware. But what if you still have a Pentium III or IV? I have an AMD 1.2 Ghz desktop computer running Windows 2000 that I am tickled pink with; it's fast and does what I want. And I expect it to be running just as well on June 30, 2005, the date Microsoft says it will halt free security support for Windows 2000 (http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifewin). Surveying my existing computer needs, the software I use, and the tasks I perform on my home computer, I can't, in fact, see any reason to have to upgrade my hardware or software in the foreseeable future!
 
See, I'm the kind of customer Microsoft doesn't like. I bought my copy of Windows 2000 (as an upgrade, actually), and if my laptop hadn't come preloaded with XP, I would have installed 2000 on that machine as well, because I like 2000 better. In that I'm not alone; more than half of corporate customers are still using 2000, according to studies. And they, like me, are probably perfectly happy with their systems. Microsoft, on the other hand, wants users to upgrade to their new operating systems, both for financial and security reasons. And chances are high that most business, if not home users, will "upgrade," buying new licenses, spending time and effort downloading and installing patches and updates for their systems, and spending money on techs who will be brought in to sort out the knots that always appear when something as major as an operating system upgrade appears.
 
I bring up this topic in the context of an announcement that appeared on the Windows XP Service Pack 2 information page (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/sp2aumng.mspx): On April 12, Microsoft will automatically install Service Pack 2 for Windows XP on your XP-powered computer, whether you want it or not. The move represents a much more invasive upgrade policy than Microsoft has had in the past. If you still wanted to use Windows 98 or even 95, the previous policy said, you were welcome to; just don't come running to Microsoft when your computer is disable by a virus or trojan attack that the company issued a patch for in subsequent supported versions of Windows, but not for 95 or 98, because the "life cycle" for those products ended. Now, however, you will have to use SP2 (which we discussed some months ago as having compatibility problems with software), "for your own good," if you have XP installed. It goes without saying that plain old XP and SP1 are now out of the picture; any future security patch for XP is going to require SP2.
 
Microsoft is doing this because it says that previous versions of XP, including SP1, had too many security problems; the fixes in SP2 will create a much more secure computing environment (although security bugs, like the one listed at http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/392354, have been found). The fixes include an upgrade to the Microsoft Firewall, improved mail security, a pop-up blocker, and improved Wi-fi compatibility - features you can already get with a plethora of third party software.
 
But what you can't get without Microsoft's assistance are the security updates, designed to plug up the holes in the registry. One of the features of SP2 is a much more aggressive approach to Microsoft Automatic Security Updates, which the company hopes will keep all customers on the same security page, updating their systems automatically as soon as problems are discovered. Of course, you can postpone the impending installation of SP2 simply by turning off automatic updates (http://www.cae.wisc.edu/site/public/?title=xp-xautoupdate), but then you will of course leave yourself vulnerable to whatever new powerful potions hackers dream up. Microsoft realizes that many XP users do not check its security bulletins, and believes that SP2 will give users a "clean slate" as far as security is concerned, and which Automatic Security Updates will maintain.
 
On the other hand, there is the time spent uploading and installing it (SP2 is over 70 MB), as well as the compatibility and other issues - meaning that you will likely have other work to do, downloading and installing patches, etc., to get back to the productivity point you were at before the SP2 upgrade. The same applies, of course, for users of Windows 2000, 98, 95, NT, or in fact other programs that have reached the end of their life cycle. According to the Microsoft Life cycle FAQ (http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy), most products get free update and security support for about 10 years (extended support continues longer). Ten years seems like a long time, but it does come to an end. At which point you are faced with a choice: Go with the Microsoft flow, or go out on your own? (You could also move to Linux, but that's another article!)
 
There's something to be said for following the path tread for users by Microsoft; if you have a problem, many others are likely to be having one too, which means that the company will have to be on the ball when it comes to security and compatibility issues. On the other hand, there's no reason to expect that SP2 will be the last security update to any Windows OS; so if you stick with the program, you’re likely to find yourself on a continuous treadmill of updating your operating system and getting your software and hardware in sync. And XP itself is nearly obsolete! The Next Big Thing, codenamed Longhorn (http://www.winsupersite.com/longhorn) is due out next year. So that's it; either you remain protected by staying with the program, or remain "free" to compute your own way, at the risk of being exposed to nasties you will no longer be defended against, at least by Microsoft . But you'll probably be OK even if you don't choose to "move forward"; I haven't heard that anti-virus software publishers and firewall makers will stop supporting Windows XP SP1, 2000, and 98 anytime soon. As long as you keep your anti-virus profiles updated and check occasional updates to your firewall, you should be able to maintain your system as it exists now for the life of your computer.
 
I would also suggest investing in a "ghosting" program, like the aptly named Norton Ghost ($70, from (http://www.symantec.com/sabu/ghost/ghost_personal). Ghost lets you completely duplicate the contents of a hard drive, including an operating system and all installed software; if anything goes wrong, you insert a floppy disk and retrieve the contents of your system from a CD or second hard drive you've stored it on. I have used Ghost extensively, and it’s a fine product. But if you want to check out another excellent (if less flexible) ghosting-type program, which doesn't cost anything at all, check out DrvImagerXP from http://woundedmoon.org/win32/drvimagerxpsetup_2.2.exe. DrvImagerXP takes a "photo" of your 2000 or XP system (will not work on 95 or 98) and stores it on another partition or hard drive, or CD or DVD as well. The best part of the program is the in-depth explanation of the way it works and the philosophy of ghosting in general. The instructions are quite detailed; make sure to read the help file thoroughly before starting your backup. DrvImagerXP saves everything, so a good strategy is to do a virus check and defragmentation before making your backup. If you schedule a backup once a week, you'll be prepared for any eventuality - and your computer's system will have a better chance of beating the odds and living forever!
 
 
 
 
March 11
2005
 
 
   by
   David Shamah
 
 
 
 
Link this!
 
 
save_to_blinkbits
 
 
 
 
  reddit
 
the Newzgeek files
Â